I.e.:
by the
importance of the
metonymy and
metaphor through
analytical work, political discourse and manifestations of art.
by the
importance of the writing, in what it leads to the return of the
driven back meaning, in the form of what we call the
Letter.
by the
importance of the Letter when (in the mathematics or topological
fields) it comes to mark a place where one cannot write any
nonsense.
We crossed the
way of other people, professors, researchers, artists, doctors,
judges, teachers, administrators, data processing specialists,
philosophers, theologians... who gave us the desire to join
without forcing ourselves, to put in correspondence our points
of view without to plug on our dissensions.
It's enough
with the idea to "fight against" illiteracy or anything
else. We just try to work "with" and "for" the
illiterate ones.
We are for the
creation of a "clinical" theory of illiteracy in order to
organize a prevention of it.
We are
experimented in the fact that contradictory debate introduce "Another
discourse" than the
one we use to ear about illiteracy. What we are talking about is
that the uncertain of the living creature depends of the Letter'
own sort.
What we are
speaking about is the importance of language.
The human
being, according to us, is given to be understand through its
logical errors, its defects and its perpetual deformations of
the language.
We do not want
these demonstrations to be reduced to a disease, a malformation
or a deficiency: terms which inaugurate of a cure, a
rehabilitation or a possible adaptation of illiterates people
and makes them regarded as sub men.
We do not want
either of warlike terminology ; we are not fighting against the
illiterate ones nor even against illiteracy. As we said before,
we work with and "for" the illiterate ones.
Our question
is about the mode of production of humanity. Our real question
is : "What kind of society for what kind of a human being" ?
What kind of world do we want and for what kind of human ?
We have made
our choice for a society acted by and through the Language,
because we think that illiteracy, as much as psychosis, autism
or other heavy nuisances, produces intelligence.
