I.e.:
by the importance of the metonymy and metaphor through analytical work, political discourse and manifestations of art.
by the importance of the writing, in what it leads to the return of the driven back meaning, in the form of what we call the Letter.
by the importance of the Letter when (in the mathematics or topological fields) it comes to mark a place where one cannot write any nonsense.
We crossed the way of other people, professors, researchers, artists, doctors, judges, teachers, administrators, data processing specialists, philosophers, theologians... who gave us the desire to join without forcing ourselves, to put in correspondence our points of view without to plug on our dissensions.
It's enough with the idea to "fight against" illiteracy or anything else. We just try to work "with" and "for" the illiterate ones.
We are for the creation of a "clinical" theory of illiteracy in order to organize a prevention of it.
We are experimented in the fact that contradictory debate introduce "Another discourse" than the one we use to ear about illiteracy. What we are talking about is that the uncertain of the living creature depends of the Letter' own sort.
What we are speaking about is the importance of language.
The human being, according to us, is given to be understand through its logical errors, its defects and its perpetual deformations of the language.
We do not want these demonstrations to be reduced to a disease, a malformation or a deficiency: terms which inaugurate of a cure, a rehabilitation or a possible adaptation of illiterates people and makes them regarded as sub men.
We do not want either of warlike terminology ; we are not fighting against the illiterate ones nor even against illiteracy. As we said before, we work with and "for" the illiterate ones.
Our question is about the mode of production of humanity. Our real question is : "What kind of society for what kind of a human being" ? What kind of world do we want and for what kind of human ?
We have made our choice for a society acted by and through the Language, because we think that illiteracy, as much as psychosis, autism or other heavy nuisances, produces intelligence.
