|
|
| |
The three persons of the grammatical Trinity:
or The lying of illiteracy.
 This
is not a pipe !
image coming from:
http://www.eetopologie.org/publications/adt/index.html
|
We start from
the principle that for beeing able to read, it is
necessary (by the means of the symbolic Death system),
to have been recorded as sexuated, which means nothing
else than to have given up being indexed “not sexuated”.
| |
We
will translate |
- the French word
sexuation by : sexuation
- the French word
sexué, by sexuated
|
It's not so easy to understand it, and
my bad English is not really helpful ! |
(Extracted the book: “Illiteracy
and Sexuation”) by Charley Supper
Let us represent for example a figure of
continuous and of
discontinuous : From Berkeley, this
Irish bishop (1685-1753), we did not progress much in this
field.
|
The continuous
The
continuous is infinite and poses the problem of
its immortality and its eternity!
The discontinuous
The
discontinuous confronted us with something which is
not without evoking Death, the interruption !
|
That is not
without evoking Yi - King either.
|
Now let us represent
Man
and
Woman
in a ludic way to imagine
that that can be well used to be embedded one in
another:
| |
Man
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
Woman
|
|
Let us use
"man" and "woman" to
represent a top-below:
This drawing is in Dimension two !
Indeed, when we write on a board or on
a sheet, all what is written there is in dimension two
(height by length).
But when we represent a top - below,
we are
then in presence of a figure of dimension two (height by
width)
in dimension three
(height by width, by
depth) and it is only by a pure artifice
of language, reading and writing,
as sexuated, that
some among us manage to see this depth of the figure
there represented by the fictitious interruption of our
line.
Like
an hallucination !
Let us use ”Man” and “Woman” to create our
diagram
1
below
Diagram 1
You see here
that even the simple representation of a simple
top-below requires the use of masculine
and feminine .
This top-below is a representation
of dimension
three in dimension two.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
What can be deduced from this
figure of a simple top-below?
If I remain on the imaginary floor, I can break up my
diagram only into the following elements:
Three independent features:
I would say there are three
sticks!
If I pass on the
floor
symbolic system, I have access to the
dimension three which will let me note that my line of
“Diagram 1” was not stopped, but passed below.
I must however have had access to the “IT” guard of the Sexuation, with the third person of my grammatical Trinity:
The IT is my access to the symbolic system!
| |
The Exit
The ex-it of the imaginary field !
“IT”
or
The Holy Spirit!
The empty Unit
or the third dimension!
This place where the Verb resides,
and also the Other of the
psychoanalysts
and where the name of God is written
(with some invisible ink)!
It is also the entry of Art
(not before!) and Love.
Other, Art, Love,
the Trinity of the big “A”
It is this place which is represented
for the Christian Saints by what they carry on the head
and that is named their aureole !
|
|
----------------------------------------------------------------------
After this exit,
this door opens to Dimension three, I will then be able
to read my diagram by breaking up my figure into his two
identical elements:
| |
1°
2°
Two identical elements
of which one
passes simply under the other
|
|
Two
identical elements of which one passes simply under the
other, which made me believe before, to the time of the
imaginary stage, that they were not similar.
The
proof is that if I turn over my diagram, I obtain the
same reversed graph. There were two equal sticks !
Initial diagram
turned over Diagram
(the colors are
there for better understanding):
There are well two identical sticks though of
different colour :
a continuous
red
a continuous
blue
 The
illiterate persons, do not have
access to Dimension three which is not the
dimension of lying but that of interpretation. Thus they
do not manage to apprehend the tops-below and cannot
thus decipher the
letters nor the words.
To have only access to
imagination (in French : imaginaire) and not to the
Symbolic Field, they will only be able to read the
Diagram 1 as follows :
So they read :
Three sticks !
They are not as false as that !
They read something which is right, but
which is out the community of humans, out the consensus
of the language of Humans .
Their
stupefied and limited air comes from the fact that they
think other people make fun of them and pretend to see
something which really does not exist. In
fact, they are limited
by their non-sexuation
which does not give them access
to the symbolic system,
therefore not to the
third dimension.
As opposed to what the
teachers say, it is not a question to give them limits,
but quite to the contrary, to make them transgress those
limits by which they are separated from the
field of symbolic system .
| |
The access to the Symbolic
System field ,
resorts as well to the lie as with the truth.
When she is reading, an illiterate person
does
not see this artifice because she is unceasingly
with the research of
the
truth of truth
|
|
,
|
|
|
|
