European psychoanalytic group for research and training on the causes of illiteracy

 

Illiteracy, topology and psychoanalysis :

 

The lying of illiteracy

The third person of grammar, this “it” (which is already contained in the word ill-it-eracy) appears for the child when he reaches Dimension three. It is only after this that he can stand up and walk.

 

 

The three persons of the grammatical Trinity:  

or The lying of illiteracy.

        This is not a pipe !

image coming from: http://www.eetopologie.org/publications/adt/index.html

We start from the principle that for beeing able to read, it is necessary (by the means of the symbolic Death system), to have been recorded as sexuated, which means nothing else than to have given up being indexed “not sexuated”.

 

 

We will translate

 
  • the French word sexuation by : sexuation
  • the French word sexué, by sexuated

It's not so easy to understand it, and my bad English is not really helpful !

(Extracted the book: “Illiteracy and Sexuation”) by Charley Supper

Let us represent for example a figure of continuous and of discontinuous : From Berkeley, this Irish bishop (1685-1753), we did not progress much in this field. 

 

The continuous

The continuous  is infinite and poses the problem of its immortality and its eternity!

 

 The discontinuous

The discontinuous confronted us with something which is not without evoking Death, the interruption !

That is not without evoking Yi - King either.

 

Now let us represent Man and  Woman in a ludic way to imagine that that can be well used to be embedded one in another:

 

 

Man

 

 
     
 

 

  Woman  

 

 

 

           Let us use "man" and "woman" to represent a top-below:

This drawing is in Dimension two !

 

Indeed, when we write on a board or on a sheet, all what is written there is in dimension two (height by length).

But when we represent a top - below, we are then in presence of a figure of dimension two (height by width) in dimension three (height by width, by depth) and it is only by a pure artifice of language, reading and writing, as sexuated, that some among us manage to see this depth of the figure there represented by the fictitious interruption of our line.

Like an hallucination !

Let us use ”Man” and “Woman” to create our diagram 1 below 

 

Diagram 1

You see here that even the simple representation of a simple top-below requires the use of  masculine and  feminine .

This top-below is a representation of dimension three in dimension two.

--------------------------------------------------------------------

What can be deduced from this figure of a simple top-below?

If I remain on the imaginary floor, I can break up my diagram only into the following elements: Three independent features:  

 

                                                    I would say there are three sticks!

                                              

 

If I pass on the floor symbolic system, I have access to the dimension three which will let me note that my line of “Diagram 1” was not stopped, but passed below.

I must however have had access to the “IT” guard of the Sexuation, with the third person of my grammatical Trinity: The IT is my access to the symbolic system!

 

 

The Exit

The ex-it of the imaginary field  !

“IT”

or

The Holy Spirit!

The empty Unit or the third dimension!

This place where the Verb resides,

and also the Other of the psychoanalysts

and where the name of God is written (with some invisible ink)!

 It is also the entry of Art  (not before!) and Love.

Other, Art, Love, the Trinity of the big “A”

It is this place which is represented for the Christian Saints by what they carry on the head and that is named their aureole !

 

 

----------------------------------------------------------------------

After this exit, this door opens to Dimension three, I will then be able to read my diagram by breaking up my figure into his two identical elements:   

 

 

 

                                        

                                     2°   

Two identical elements of which one passes simply under the other

 

 

 

                                        

Two identical elements of which one passes simply under the other, which made me believe before, to the time of the imaginary stage, that they were not similar.

The proof is that if I turn over my diagram, I obtain the same reversed graph. There were two equal sticks !

 

 

                                             Initial diagram                                                    turned over Diagram

 

(the colors are there for better understanding):

There are well two identical sticks though of different colour :

a continuous red

 a continuous blue

 

Text Box: So, they read
The illiterate persons, do not have access to Dimension three  which is not the dimension of lying but that of interpretation. Thus they do not manage to apprehend the tops-below and cannot thus decipher the letters nor the words.

To have only access to imagination (in French : imaginaire) and not to the Symbolic Field, they will only be able to read the Diagram 1 as follows :

So they read :

Three sticks !

                 They are not as false as that !                  

 

They read something which is right, but which is out the community of humans, out the consensus of the language of Humans .

Their stupefied and limited air comes from the fact that they think other people make fun of them and pretend to see something which really does not exist. In fact, they are limited by their  non-sexuation which does not give them access to the symbolic system, therefore not to the third dimension.

As opposed to what the teachers say, it is not a question to give them limits, but quite to the contrary, to make them transgress those limits   by which they are separated from the field of symbolic system .

 

 

The access to the Symbolic System field, resorts as well to the lie as with the truth.

When she is reading, an illiterate person does not see this artifice because she is unceasingly with the research of  the truth of truth

 

 

,

 

   
 
 

      Participate to the site, propose your texts !

   
 
ILLETTRISME ..... ILLITERACY ..... ILLETTRISMUS ..... ILLETTERATISMO .....

ΑΓΡΑΜΜΑΤΟΣΥΝΗ

.....

ILETRISMO